National Parks Service Proposes Doubling Entry Fees, Mulls Reservations

Contributing Editor Carl Unger believes that every trip is worth taking. He loves an extended trip to Europe as much as he enjoys exploring the towns and landscape near home. Basically, you'll find him wherever there is good food, fresh air, and plenty of stories to bring home.

Carl has been writing for SmarterTravel since 2005. His travel writing has also appeared on USA Today and the About.com Boston travel guide.

The Handy Item I Always Pack: "It's not revolutionary, but a small Moleskine notebook is my one travel must-have. It's great for noting things you want to remember and it takes up hardly any space in your bag."

Ultimate Bucket List Experience: "Japan. I'd love to take a month off and visit the cities, temples, and countryside. I'm fascinated by the country's juxtaposition of ancient traditions and modern ambitions."

Travel Motto: “Why do you go away? So that you can come back. So that you can see the place you came from with new eyes and extra colors. And the people there see you differently, too. Coming back to where you started is not the same as never leaving.” –Terry Pratchett

Aisle, Window, or Middle Seat: "Window."

See recent posts by Carl Unger

The U.S. National Park Service recently proposed doubling entry fees at the 17 most-popular parks, and one park is now considering creating a reservations system for visitors, the Associated Press reports.

Under the new fee structure, the service would charge $70 for non-commercial vehicles, $50 for motorcycles, and $30 per person. The fee hikes would apply to peak-season months only, which the park service defines as the busiest five-month period for each particular park. The park service says “the funds raised are critically needed to improve facilities and infrastructure and to provide an enhanced level of service, all of which would have a direct impact on the visitor.

These proposed fee hikes come at a time when the parks system is more popular than ever—a record 330 million people visited last year, during the Parks Service centennial. National park visits have grown steadily over the past several years, and the parks being considered for the higher entrance fees have weathered the brunt of that growth: The NPS says the parks included in the proposed fee hike represent 70 percent of the total of all entrance fees throughout the country (only 118 of the system’s 417 sites charge a fee at all.)

While the surge in visitation is mostly a positive thing, it puts great strain on the NPS and the parks themselves, not to mention visitors who encounter traffic jams and other consequences of crowds.

Speaking of traffic jams, Arches National Park is considering a change that, if successful, one can easily see expanding to other parks around the country. The Associated Press reports that park officials think timed reservation slots may alleviate some of the roadway and parking congestion currently plaguing Arches. The proposal would limit entries during “certain three-hour windows between 7 a.m. and 6 p.m. over the March-through-October high season.”

The Salt Lake Tribune adds that the park service has doubled the amount of parking at popular destinations within the park and explored a shuttle system, but nothing has helped the traffic crush. Timed entries will be difficult for visitors who can’t plan ahead, or who simply prefer the freedom of visiting whenever they want. But Park Superintendent Kate Cannon believes the proposal will actually increase visitation by spreading entries evenly throughout the day.

“When [visitors] get in the park, they breathe a sigh of relief, but when they get to where they want to go they can’t find a place to park. They circle, they circle. They go to the next place, they circle,” Cannon told the Tribune. “We want people to come in and enjoy the place but we need to change the way we manage traffic.”

Keep in mind that both the fee hike and revised entry system are still just proposals, and may never see the light of day. But clearly, the NPS is feeling the effect of its record-high visits. If the changes do occur, however, both would have a negative impact on visitors in the short-term. But in the long-term, perhaps these could help preserve the parks for future generations. That’s the idea, right?

The following parks are included in the fee hike proposal:

Acadia National Park
Arches National Park
Bryce Canyon National Park
Canyonlands National Park
Denali National Park
Glacier National Park
Grand Canyon National Park
Grand Teton National Park
Joshua Tree National Park
Mount Rainier National Park
Rocky Mountain National Park
Olympic National Park
Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Park
Shenandoah National Park
Yellowstone National Park
Yosemite National Park
Zion National Park

Readers, have you visited any of these national parks over the past few years? What was your experience? Tell us in the comments below.

More from SmarterTravel:

We hand-pick everything we recommend and select items through testing and reviews. Some products are sent to us free of charge with no incentive to offer a favorable review. We offer our unbiased opinions and do not accept compensation to review products. All items are in stock and prices are accurate at the time of publication. If you buy something through our links, we may earn a commission.